SCwatch


TEOH BENG HOCK’S ‘SUICIDE CONUNDRUM’ : DID HE OR DID HE NOT?

The objective is to frustrate. Murder must not stick. Homicide must not stick. Even if suicide cannot be proven beyond doubt, the death itself must be blurred to the extent that doubts and questions remain unanswered …… that a case of misadventure be the remaining conclusion.

But please do not forget that perception can never change notwithstanding the doubts cast by the lawyers.

And that perception is that a thirty year old chap, and who is to marry his pregnant sweet-heart the next day, would not commit suicide.

So yes, maybe at the end of the day, a suicide verdict might prevail. And if so, it will just be the ammunition for the opposition to work on at the next general elections.

Advertisements

Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: